Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Rick is supporting the "Day Without a Gay" protest on Dec. 10 by declaring a holiday on his email, websites, and Facebook (not boycotting already hurting stores).

Rick is supporting the "Day Without a Gay" protest on Dec. 10 by declaring a holiday on his email, websites, and Facebook (not boycotting already hurting stores).

To learn more: http://www.daywithoutagay.org/

I think that boycotting anything right now is NOT a good idea, in light of the economy. WHAT I PLAN TO DO is post a reply on my email, websites, and Facebook stating that they will not be active on Dec.10 in support of the 'Day Without a Gay' protest against Prop 8 and discrimination against people who...  Read More cannot marry the person they love because of it. This will get the message out to millions if we all participate. Please join me in this Internet-email protest!

--
"Violence is anything that denies human integrity and leads to hopelessness or helplessness."
-- Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Friday, September 19, 2008

FW: Join Clergy for Obama ~ link to Obama's Website

Thanks to Rev. Paula Bishop for forwarding. I am forwarding to all my minister friends, even though I realize you may also receive it from other sources.  -- Rick Mitchell


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paula Bishop Pociecha <soul-full@comcast.net>
Date: 2008/9/19
Subject: FW: Join Clergy for Obama ~ link to Obama's Website
To: paula@ccncn.org


Please take action if this suits you, or just ignore and delete if it doesn't.  Just passing along to widely distrubute....
 
Paula
 
--
Rev. Paula Bishop Pociecha
Minister of Congregational Care
CCNC-N
9260 Alcosta Blvd., C-18
San Ramon CA 94583
(925) 556-9900
soul-full@comcast.net
 

-------------- Forwarded Message: --------------
From: Alexandra Childs

Subject: Join Clergy for Obama ~ link to Obama's Website
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:10:56 +0000


Greetings Friends & Colleagues,

Please check out the link below as a chance to join other clergy in supporting Barack Obama.  I hope you will join me and spread the word in wider circles.  Of course, I share this not as the pastor of any specific church (because I'm not!) but as a concerned and faithful citizen writing to friends and colleagues.  

I feel in my bones this is an election for the soul of America... Who do we REALLY want to be in this world ?  A fear-based warrior, rouge, debtor nation ?  Or a nation in relationship with the rest of the world, and once again a leader, with allies and compassion for humanity and the earth.


Go to http://clergy4obama.wordpress.com/add-your-signature/ 
 
Got Hope ? Peace and power to the people.

ps  My apologies if this seems too forward to you, but I am forgoing a little decorum because this time in history feels so urgent, as if we are hanging over a precipice. It's more important to speak our truths than to focus only on being polite.. Thank You for all that you are passionate about too!!


Sunday, March 25, 2007

A short but powerful talk by Muhammad Yunus, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize for 2006

A short but powerful talk by Muhammad Yunus, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize for 2006

http://www.grameen-info.org/agrameen/speech.php3?speech=4

Muhammad Yunus was awarded the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize, along with Grameen Bank, for "their efforts to create economic and social development from below" (Norwegian Nobel Committee). He is the first and so far only Bangladeshi to win the prestigious award. The award also marked a shift away from the conventions by awarding it to someone who worked to promote peace indirectly through economic upliftment of the masses.

The address above links to a speech by Professor Yunus on receiving an honorary degree at the University of the South in Sewanee, Tennessee, in January, 1998. I think it is remarkable in its brevity and clarity -- communicating the essence of Yunus' experience and philosophy in just a few well-chosen words. His actions have already made a very significant impact, and his challenge for us to 'rethink' the world is one that a great many people all over the world will now be exposed to.

The website contains other links to many of Yunus' other speeches, as well as to the site of the Grameen Bank, if you are interested in learning more about him, the bank, and their work.


[Thanks to Dr. Ron Elsdon, professor at John F. Kennedy University, Pleasant Hill, California, for forwarding Dr. Yunus speech to us.]



Thursday, December 21, 2006

[PeacePolitical Blog] An Editorial by the Editor

A CALL FOR A CHANGE IN LEADERSHIP

Surely any extraterrestial beings, or Being if you prefer, looking at Earth from afar with 'benevolent watchfulness' and hoping for Peace On Earth, must have superhuman powers of patience to have let the human race run the bloody course it has taken and continues to take -- up to the present moment.

In recent decades, we have had the ability to see the Earth from afar ourselves, and the pictures sent back of the tiny blue-green planet have made us realize how marvelous and relatively unique it is. Although the peoples of Earth have never even approached a capability of unified planetary self-governance, a system of treaties and international laws has grown up that effectively organizes the affairs of nations with respect to each other -- as long as there is willing participation and compliance, by the most powerful nations, at least.

The current Bush administration has led the U.S. in a unilateral disavowal of this system of laws and treaties -- moving the world backwards toward the rule of brute power and force -- not for the benefit, even, of the people of this country, but for the benefit of the few, the rich, the powerful members of multinational corporations and de facto political conglomerates (or 'alliances').

The voters of the U.S. expressed very clearly their disapproval of the actions of this administration last month (November, 2006) in the midterm elections which turned out the Republican majorities of both houses of Congress and by continuing to give President Bush a 'vote of no confidence' in the form of increasingly low (approaching an unprecedented low) level of approval and popularity. Yet, even in the face of this, Bush's dogged determination and dedication to his own particular hope and views of the war in Iraq tends to be seen as an admirable trait of character and leadership.

Given this set of circumstances, the nation faces a truly challenging dilemma.

We need to fashion a workable way to resolve a disparity between the President, administration, and the people by whose consent the elected officials, including the President and his appointed administration, are allowed to govern. In the British parliamentary system, a call for resignation could be initiated by the legislative houses and, by tradition, the chief executive would be bound to honor their vote.

It is well-known that the resignation of Richard Nixon was essentially assured once the leading members of his own party told him that it was time to go peaceably and voluntarily. The position of George W. Bush is much closer to this circumstance than acknowledged. The members of the Baker-Hamilton review commission have recommended a scaling back of the war in Iraq and increased use of diplomacy, especially with Iran, Syria, and of course, Israel, to find ways to bring political incentives for resolution of the conflicts in the region, including Palestine. This would be a dramatic change in course from the U.S. military dominance (including their support of the Israeli military) in Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq, and other key points in the Middle East and elsewhere.

Such a dramatic change of course, urged by Republican as well as Democratic leaders (including those who have seen long-standing service within their respective parties and with previous administrations of both major parties), may well require a change of leadership at the highest level -- namely the President and Vice-President.

It would appear that a rational analysis of the current situation, as we enter into a new year, suggests that a more formal call for such a change in leadership may be in order. Stay tuned, and remember, you heard it here first.

Rick Mitchell, Editor

Sunday, October 08, 2006

Re: Kurt Vonnegut Said It's the Apocalypse

Re: Kurt Vonnegut...

Hmm, let's see, he sells 250K copies (at probably $20-30 apiece), his popularity has never gone away, and he's a "rare literary figure who never stopped being cool." Well, at least, the reviewer isn't damning him with faint praise.

An "unimitative and inimitable social satirist" who uses terms like "very soon" and "by-and-by" to predict his "laughing prophet of doom" scenarios, he has the peak-oilsian mantra down to a t with phrases like "There is nothing they can do," and "It's over, my friend. The game is lost."

Unfortunately, people like Bush, Cheney, Rummy, and friends do (and probably will continue to) think up "things to do," and I, for one, would like to suggest that there just might be better alternatives if we could get off the dead center of blase cynicism and/or defeatist hand-wringing. :-))

And, by the way, Jeremiah was known as the weeping prophet, not the laughing one, though I suspect he might prefer today to laugh, because this is all so crazy-laughable. Well, as Simon & Garfunkel said, the words of the prophets are written on the subway walls -- and perhaps sometimes in best sellers. The original writing on the wall ( Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin) was the biblical author's way of saying "It's over -- the game is lost" and that the King was "lightweight" (and toast) which may be what the reviewer is trying to get around to saying about Vonnegut.

Since there seems to be no shortage of published writers, I assume that better ones than Vonnegut have, or wi
ll, come along. His son, Mark, wrote a pretty gripping tale about his own quest for meaning, excessive drug use, and eventual decision to become a doctor. The elder Vonnegut refers to his son, however, as "my son, the doctor" and not the writer -- indicating the conclusion that, after all, one's preference is what makes the ultimate determination of what one does or doesn't do. So, the bottom line, for Vonneguts or for the rest of us, remains "The choice is ours."


On 10/8/06, Dennis Brumm <brumm@brumm.com > wrote:
A "nice," dreary piece from August that I missed, though this is just a partial (hope you bought Rolling Stone to get the full bad news, as if most of us haven't heard this/don't already believe some/much of this). Interesting that it is "suddenly going to dry up." He needs Peak Oil 101:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/11123162/kurt_vonnegut_says_this_is_the_end_of_the_world
DOUGLAS BRINKLEY

"I'm Jeremiah, and I'm not talking about God being mad at us," novelist Kurt Vonnegut says with a straight face, gazing out the parlor windows of his Manhattan brownstone. "I'm talking about us killing the planet as a life-support system with gasoline. What's going to happen is, very soon, we're going to run out of petroleum, and everything depends on petroleum. And there go the school buses. There go the fire engines. The food trucks will come to a halt. This is the end of the world. We've become far too dependent on hydrocarbons, and it's going to suddenly dry up. You talk about the gluttonous Roaring Twenties. That was nothing. We're crazy, going crazy, about petroleum. It's a drug like crack cocaine. Of course, the lunatic fringe of Christianity is welcoming the end of the world as the rapture. So I'm Jeremiah. It's going to have to stop. I'm sorry."

For the most part, this sort of apocalyptic attitude is to be expected from Vonnegut, who, after all, in his futuristic novel Cat's Cradle (1963) created Ice-Nine, a substance with the capacity to obliterate the Earth incrementally, like the "great door of heaven being closed softly." The naive protagonist of the novel -- a character named John/Jonah -- actually struggles to write a book titled The Day the World Ended. (Cat's Cradle also includes a hilarious faux religion known as Bokononism, whose religious texts carry the warning "All of the true things I am about to tell you are shameless lies.") In the interview collection Conversations With Kurt Vonnegut, he even dismisses the notion that his fourteen novels, six essay collections and dozens of short stories have a long shelf life, saying, "Anybody with any sense knows the whole solar system will go up like a celluloid collar by-and-by." Add to that doomsday scenario Vonnegut's notorious bouts of chronic depression, daily doldrums and suicidal longings, and you get a literary Cassandra of the first order.

Later, remembering his hyperagitation about global warming, I telephoned him at his Long Island summer cottage, curious about whether he saw Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth. "I know what it's all about," he scoffed. "I don't need any more persuasion." Not satisfied with his answer, I pressed him to expand, wondering if he had any advice for young people who want to join the increasingly vocal environmental movement. "There is nothing they can do," he bleakly answered. "It's over, my friend. The game is lost."

In the annals of American literature, Vonnegut has been categorized as a black-humorist -- a post-Hiroshima novelist who encouraged readers to laugh at the ghastly absurdity of the modern condition. More than any other fiction writer, Vonnegut has been unafraid to peer into the apocalyptic abyss of our lives. This is likely why, after five and a half years of the Bush administration, Vonnegut's signature bleak wit seems more relevant than ever. His most recent book, A Man Without a Country, a collection of essays, was a surprise best seller last year, spending more than eight weeks on the New York Times best-seller list and selling more than 250,000 copies. It would be simple enough to say that Vonnegut is having a major late-career resurgence, except for the fact that he never really went away. Vonnegut is that rare literary figure who never stopped being cool. Ever since he rose to prominence during the 1960s, Vonnegut -- with his Twainian mop of curly hair, bushy Bavarian beer-hall mustache and carbolic-acid smirk -- has been dubbed a prose shaman with a trick bag full of preposterous characters. Harper's deemed him an "unimitative and inimitable social satirist," and The New York Times anointed him the "laughing prophet of doom."

On this day, though, as Vonnegut sips coffee and his tiny white dog, Flour, yaps in the background, there is no wry amusement or social satire in his repertoire. There is only burning dissent about the way modern technology and global capitalism are usurping the last gasps of goodness from honest laborers' lives. And deep sadness that everyday humans are butchering their most civilized impulses. But then Vonnegut starts coughing, clearing his throat of phlegm, grasping for a half-smoked pack of Pall Malls lying on a coffee table. He quickly lights up. His wheezing ceases. I ask him whether he worries that cigarettes are killing him. "Oh, yes," he answers, in what is clearly a set-piece gag. "I've been smoking Pall Mall unfiltered cigarettes since I was twelve or fourteen. So I'm going to sue the Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company, who manufactured them. And do you know why?" "Lung cancer?" I offer.

"No. No. Because I'm eighty-three years old. The lying bastards! On the package Brown & Williamson promised to kill me. Instead, their cigarettes didn't work. Now I'm forced to suffer leaders with names like Bush and Dick and, up until recently, 'Colon.'"....

(Get the full article in the current Rolling Stone, on newsstands until August 24th, 2006.)

Saturday, September 09, 2006

No Left Turns - a 'Garrison Keilor' type story by Michael Gartner

Enjoy! Thanks, Dale Lloyd and Bob Moore.

After reading the following story I wonder how close I am to taking no
left turns. Actually its good advice. I remember talking to my mom
and dad about this many many years ago. They too lived to be in their
nineties. Have a great day! Bob

No Left Turns - Great Story!
By Michael Gartner

My father never drove a car.

Well, that's not quite right.

I should say I never saw him drive a car. He quit driving in 1927,
when he was 25 years old, and the last car he drove was a 1926
Whippet.

"In those days," he told me when he was in his 90s, "to drive a car
you had to do things with your hands, and do things with your feet,
and look every which way, and I decided you could walk through life
and enjoy it or drive through life and miss it."

At which point my mother, a sometimes salty Irishwoman, chimed in:
"Oh, bull----!" she said. "He hit a horse."

"Well," my father said, "there was that, too."

So my brother and I grew up in a household without a car. The
neighbors all had cars -- the Kollingses next door had a green 1941
Dodge, the VanLaninghams across the street a gray 1936 Plymouth, the
Hopsons two doors down a black 1941 Ford -- but we had none.

My father, a newspaperman in Des Moines, would take the streetcar to
work and, often as not, walk the 3 miles home. If he took the
streetcar home, my mother and brother and I would walk the three
blocks to the streetcar stop, meet him and walk home together.

My brother, David, was born in 1935, and I was born in 1938, and
sometimes, at dinner, we'd ask how come all the neighbors had cars but
we had none. "No one in the family drives," my mother would explain,
and that was that. But, sometimes, my father would say, "But as soon
as one of you boys turns 16, we'll get one."

It was as if he wasn't sure which one of us would turn 16 first.

But, sure enough, my brother turned 16 before I did, so in 1951 my
parents bought a used 1950 Chevrolet from a friend who ran the parts
department at a Chevy dealership downtown. It was a four-door, white
model, stick shift, fender skirts, loaded with everything, and, since
my parents didn't drive, it more or less became my brother's car.

Having a car but not being able to drive didn't bother my father, but
it didn't make sense to my mother. So in 1952, when she was 43 years
old, she asked a friend to teach her to drive. She learned in a nearby
cemetery, the place where I learned to drive the following year and
where, a generation later, I took my two sons to practice driving. The
cemetery probably was my father's idea. "Who can your mother hurt in
the cemetery?" I remember him saying once.

For the next 45 years or so, until she was 90, my mother was the
driver in the family. Neither she nor my father had any sense of
direction, but he loaded up on maps -- though they seldom left the
city limits -- and appointed himself navigator. It seemed to work.

Still, they both continued to walk a lot. My mother was a devout
Catholic, and my father an equally devout agnostic, an arrangement
that didn't seem to bother either of them through their 75 years of
marriage. (Yes, 75 years, and they were deeply in love the entire
time.) He retired when he was 70, and nearly every morning for the
next 20 years or so, he would walk with her the mile to St.
Augustin's Church. She would walk down and sit in the front pew, and
he would wait in the back until he saw which of the parish's two
priests was on duty that morning.

If it was the pastor, my father then would go out and take a 2-mile
walk, meeting my mother at the end of the service and walking her
home. If it was the assistant pastor, he'd take just a 1-mile walk
and then head back to the church. He called the priests "Father Fast"
and "Father Slow."

After he retired, my father almost always accompanied my mother
whenever she drove anywhere, even if he had no reason to go along. If
she were going to the beauty parlor, he'd sit in the car and read, or
go take a stroll or, if it was summer, have her keep the engine
running so he could listen to the Cubs game on the radio. (In the
evening, then, when I'd stop by, he'd explain: "The Cubs lost again.
The millionaire on second base made a bad throw to the millionaire on
first base, so the multimillionaire on third base scored.") If she
were going to the grocery store, he would go along to carry the bags
out -- and to make sure she loaded up on ice cream.

As I said, he was always the navigator, and once, when he was 95 and
she was 88 and still driving, he said to me, "Do you want to know the
secret of a long life?" "I guess so," I said, knowing it probably
would be something bizarre.

"No left turns," he said.

"What?" I asked.

"No left turns," he repeated. "Several years ago, your mother and I
read an article that said most accidents that old people are in happen
when they turn left in front of oncoming traffic. As you get older,
your eyesight worsens, and you can lose your depth perception, it
said. So your mother and I decided never again to make a left turn."

"What?" I said again. "No left turns," he said. "Think about it.
Three rights are the same as a left, and that's a lot safer. So we
always make three rights."

"You're kidding!" I said, and I turned to my mother for support.
"No," she said, "your father is right. We make three rights. It
works." But then she added: "Except when your father loses count." I
was driving at the time, and I almost drove off the road as I started
laughing. "Loses count?" I asked. "Yes," my father admitted, "that
sometimes happens. But it's not a problem. You just make seven
rights, and you're okay again."

I couldn't resist. "Do you ever go for 11?" I asked.

"No," he said. "If we miss it at seven, we just come home and call it
a bad day. Besides, nothing in life is so important it can't be put
off another day or another week."

My mother was never in an accident, but one evening she handed me her
car keys and said she had decided to quit driving. That was in 1999,
when she was 90. She lived four more years, until 2003. My father died
the next year, at 102. They both died in the bungalow they had moved
into in 1937 and bought a few years later for $3,000. (Sixty years
later, my brother and I paid $8,000 to have a shower put in the tiny
bathroom -- the house had never had one. My father would have died
then and there if he knew the shower cost nearly three times what he
paid for the house.) He continued to walk daily -- he had me get him
a treadmill when he was 101 because he was afraid he'd fall on the
icy sidewalks but wanted to keep exercising -- and he was of sound
mind and sound body until the moment he died.

One September afternoon in 2004, he and my son went with me when I
had to give a talk in a neighboring town, and it was clear to all
three of us that he was wearing out, though we had the usual
wide-ranging conversation about politics and newspapers and things in
the news. A few weeks earlier, he had told my son, "You know, Mike,
the first hundred years are a lot easier than the second hundred." At
one point in our drive that Saturday, he said, "You know, I'm
probably not going to live much longer."

"You're probably right," I said.

That night, I suggested to my son and daughter that we sit up with
him through the night. He appreciated it, he said, though at one
point, apparently seeing us look gloomy, he said: "I would like to
make an announcement. No one in this room is dead yet."

An hour or so later, he spoke his last words: "I want you to know,"
he said, clearly and lucidly, "that I am in no pain. I am very
comfortable. And I have had as happy a life as anyone on this earth
could ever have." A short time later, he died.

I miss him a lot, and I think about him a lot. I've wondered now and
then how it was that my family and I were so lucky that he lived so
long. I can't figure out if it was because he walked through life.

Or because he quit taking left turns.

[Michael Gartner has been editor of newspapers large and small and
president of NBC News. In 1997, he won the Pulitzer Prize for
editorial writing.]

Monday, August 21, 2006

Helping Hands: Dedicated Health Professionals Often Serve as'God's Hands'

by Rev. Rick Mitchell, Ph.D.

My life has been blessed -- and made more livable -- by those in the
'helping professions.' I consider dedicated doctors, dentists, and
counselors to truly be 'Godsends' in my life and the lives of my
family.

When I was 19 years old I first had kidney stones, and I experienced
more than a dozen over the next twelve to fifteen years. Our doctor at
Kaiser sent me to a specialist who prescribed a medication that I
still take -- and it has eliminated the problem of kidney stones in my
life. Later, another Kaiser doctor prescribed the medication that has
prevented migraine headaches, which I'd suffered from for many years.
He also continued a process of blood pressure control, and recently a
clinical pharmacist at Kaiser discovered the basic cause of my
hypertension. Now, thanks to all of them, my blood pressure is once
again back to normal.

The doctors also tested me for sleep apnea and provided a 'sleep
machine' that I now use. It eliminates snoring (which Sandy
appreciates), and it avoids apnea that interferes with sleep and is
potentially quite dangerous. During a routine 'treadmill' test, I was
diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and placed on Coumadin, a
blood-thinning medication that may prevent a deadly stroke. Sandy and
other family members have also received hospital care over the years,
and doctors, nurses, midwives, and others helped bring us a son,
daughter, and three grandsons. So we consider our lives to have been
very richly blessed by health-care providers...

A problem I still struggle with is anger -- a tendency that also
plagued my father and grandfather. Because of it, I've alienated
friends, made those around me uncomfortable, and caused my own family
grief. I've gotten counseling related to this for more than 15 years,
and I credit those counselors with saving my marriage and mental
health. In my case, antidepressant meds have helped immensely to
reduce depression and anxiety, and I have frequently suggested to
others that they ask their doctor if such a medication might be
helpful to them.

Looking back in my family, there was not always the acceptance of
getting help, especially where mental health issues were concerned.
While my father wasn't physically abusive (by the standards of his
day), family life was often tense, and psychological/verbal abuse
occurred more often than it should have. We are so thankful that this
cyclic family pattern has been reduced and hopefully eliminated
through help gained from medical and counseling assistance we have
received.

Does all this have anything to do with the church's life and mission?
You bet it does! It's often been said that God has "no hands but our
hands," and I believe that one of God's most favored channels of help
for hurting humanity is through those who've made a personal
commitment to the 'helping professions.' We can all do our part by
being accepting, supportive, and understanding of others' needs --
and our own.

Sunday, July 23, 2006

Dylan Addison's speech at his high school graduation

My good friend, Rick Eckel, of Ashland, Oregon, was very impressed
with the speech of Ashland High School valedictorian Dylan Addison,
and he asked him for a copy. I have also found it quite impressive,
and I think you might too. Here it is -- and many thanks, Dylan, for
sharing your understanding, and to Rick for forwarding it on to us.

I think perhaps Dylan is onto something really, really big here --
something that may be beyond words to fully describe and communicate,
but I think he has done an amazingly good job of presenting it
concisely and cohesively to his graduating class -- something for
them, and for us, to think about and maybe act on and change our lives
for the better because of it.

-- Rick Mitchell

Dylan Addison's Last Shibang

First of all, who am I? I mean, who am I really? You might say,
you're Dylan Addison, a valedictorian and a very charming fellow. That
may be true, but I at least know that in the past 9 months being
valedictorian has turned into so much more than a title. It's become a
way of looking at those grades, and saying "hey bud, let's party." Of
course, the accomplishments that make me Dylan Addison and who that is
exactly may not be the right question, so I ask, who are you? Who are
you, why are you sitting on planet Earth, revolving around a sun
moving through a galaxy, a universe, the infinite void… Who? And Why?

Ok, metaphysics aside, I would like to continue my speech with
something thicker. Something smoother, something chunky. It'll be like
peanut butter. And I know what you're thinking. You're thinking
"Dylan, I'm allergic to peanut butter" or "but Dylan, I know someone
who's allergic to peanut butter, so I don't think I should be taking
this from you…" Then I say to you "Friend, you will listen to every
last word I have to say, because I've worked for four long years to
bring you this message."

A poem by Ella Wheeler Wilcox reads:

One ship drives east and another drives west
With the selfsame winds that blow.
'Tis the set of sails and not the gales
Which tells us the way to go.

Do you know what I gleam from that? Your attitude IS EVERYTHING
in this life. It's not a little bit, it's not a smidgen or a tiny
taste of everything – Your Attitude, the beliefs you hold, determine
everything you will experience. The fact is that the same wind will
blow on us all, but it is the set of your sails that will guide you in
life. You get to choose what you believe, and what you believe
determines what you experience. Furthermore, the stronger your
beliefs, the more your experience in life will reflect them. And
that's interesting. How strongly do you believe, and in what? We'll
see if that changes here today.

Because you know, there's a funny thing about beliefs in that the
best way to increase their power is by giving them away. Unlike
physical possessions, which when given away divide up ownership and
denote loss, you can not lessen a belief by sharing it with another
person. Quite the contrary, because all of your shared belief is still
yours after you've given all of it away. On top of that, if the people
you give that belief to accept it and make it their own, they further
reinforce the idea in your mind and thus increase its power.

Do you know what? I believe in a thing called love. It would be
wonderful if you could join me in that. Love is the most powerful
concept the human mind can bear witness to, and I believe it. Now, I'm
not talking about high school oo ja boo boo love, no. I'm speaking of
that intangible power that is all inclusive throughout the universe,
past the boundaries of right and wrong, good and bad, allness and
nothingness, you and me, me and me… I believe in sharing this love
because that is all we have. Let's face it. We're here, we've found
it, this is life. This is the beginning and the end. This is both the
journey and the destination. Right here, in this moment. THIS MOMENT!
We must set aside all feelings of doubt, hate, fear, guilt not because
they are bad, but because they simply do not exist! Do you follow?
Those emotions have no basis in reality and no foundation to stand on.
Take fear, you can only be afraid of something that happened in the
past or of something that you think will happen in the future…both of
which are NONEXISTANT! This cannot be overstated. Please come with me
on this because it is so simple. There is only this moment, and we
must use it for love, because that is the only thing that has ever
really existed. It is the concept which every other power bearing
concept aspires to. Courage, forgiveness, acceptance, integrity love
is at the top of the food chain! There is no reason not to feel love
and not to be love. In my opinion, that's why we're here. We've got
one job to do: to be full of joy and love and bliss and peace. And I'm
doing my part. But what about you?

That's it, that is literally all there is. Now you have to go off
and make your world – you know, that completely subjective experience
that only you will ever really know about – make your world a
tremendous and lovely place to be, because you'll have to live with it
the rest of your life and in my opinion, the rest of eternity. That
right there is motivation enough let alone the fact that love feels
better than anything… ever. So go out and get some good lovin'. Get
it, and share it and strengthen it. Let it out and let it in. Besides,
who are you to be keeping yourself from feeling love? Ask yourself
that. Who are YOU to be keeping YOURSELF from feeling love? WHO AM I?
I'm Dylan Addison, a valedictorian and a very charming fellow. That is
all. May love bless you all.

Monday, July 17, 2006

We Must See Beyond the Dream to the Necessary Reality

by Rev. Rick Mitchell, Ph.D.

The recent Baptist Peace Fellowship meeting featured the theme
"Becoming the Beloved Community" of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King,
Jr. The conference speakers, led by the Rev. Dr. J. Alfred Smith,
included the Rev. C. T. Vivian, a colleague of Dr. King, and Rabbis
Michael Lerner and Lynn Gotttlieb. We were challenged by the hope and
courage of these leaders who follow in the path of Dr. King's dream of
peace and justice.

As Dr. Gary Percesepe, outgoing Director of the fellowship, has
pointed out (in his article, "Seeing Beyond the Dream Speech:
Recovering Martin Luther King's Vision of the World House," January
14, 2005), Dr. King called us to nothing less than a "revolution of
values" that will bring a transformation to the world we live in.

King said that we must shift from a "'thing'-oriented society to a
'person'-oriented society." His reading of the story of the Good
Samaritan is not merely a call to us for individual compassion and
personal transformation but rather to basic structural and systemic
social change. "We are called to play the Good Samaritan... but that
will be only an initial act. One day the whole Jericho Road must be
transformed so that men and women will not be beaten and robbed as
they make their journey through life. True compassion is more than
flinging a coin at a beggar; it understands that an edifice which
produces beggars needs restructuring."

King believed that "There is nothing but a lack of social vision to
prevent us from paying an adequate wage to every American citizen...
[and] reordering our priorities, so that the pursuit of peace will
take precedence over the pursuit of war." Such a revolution of values,
he argued, is our best defense against enemies -- to remove conditions
of poverty, insecurity, and injustice which are the fertile soil in
which dissidence and terrorism grow and develop.

In the "World House" chapter of his book, Where Do We Go From Here:
Chaos or Community, (1967), based upon his Nobel Peace Prize lecture
in 1964, Dr. King suggested we all now live in a "world house" in
which we have to coexist -- "a family unduly separated in ideas,
culture and interest, who, because we can never again live apart, must
learn somehow to live with each other in peace."

King knew that a transformed world meant seeing beyond our own borders
and local interests -- with true patriotism, not narrow nationalism.
In the words of Dr. King, "Our loyalties must become ecumenical rather
than sectional. Every nation must now develop an overriding loyalty to
mankind as a whole in order to preserve the best in their individual
societies."

Ten days before King's assassination, Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel
declared, "The whole future of America will depend on the impact and
influence of Dr. King." For us to forget the message of King and the
deep implications of his call to justice and peace would be not only
faithless but also suicidal.

Saturday, June 17, 2006

The core of faith: the Way of love

by Rev. Rick Mitchell, Ph.D.

What is the central core of our faith? That's the question I ended up with after reading Sam Harris's book, "The End of Faith." Dr. Harris argues that religious faith is irrational belief in the supernatural -- including a supreme being, whether in Christian, Jewish, Islamic, or other god-centered religious traditions.

Most Christians would likely say "Christ" is the core of our faith -- but what is meant by that? Is it faith in Jesus' teachings, his life's mission or his personal connection with God? And, who or what is God -- a personal being whom we worship or a principle or life-force? And must others express a belief in Christ in order to reach God or are there many paths to the sacred and holy?

As someone has said, these are good questions to recognize and live with. Hopefully, we will eventually "live into" answers that satisfy and offer peace to us personally. Having become a Christian as a young man, I have found that my understanding has grown and deepened with passing years. My answer will not be yours -- or someone else's  -- but I can only try to state my own as best I can.

For me, Christ is the "anointed one," a person who "points to" God and who leads and helps us on our journey to our life's spiritual destination. Certainly, I believe Jesus' life represented such a calling and role for millions of us who have sought to follow (imperfectly) in his footsteps. Are there others who did or will fill this role? I believe so, as I and so many others have recognized truth and wholeness in those of other religious traditions. Jesus, to me, fills the "office of Christ" -- maybe as a result of a "Christ event" (which he said we could expect to see again), and different people are often said to be "types of Christ." Indeed, the very name "Christian" was originally intended to mean "little Christs." Few, indeed, live up to that name, but perhaps some do.

When I was in college, I had a crisis of faith -- as many young people that age do. In facing up to whether or not I "believed" in God, I realized that values on which my life was based -- love, joy, and peace with the universe -- were my own personal experience and understanding of God. It is not some concept or even spiritual manifestation of God that is most important, but values, loves, and commitments that inspire us and that we are connected with in our daily lives. It isn't a question of believing in a certain kind of God or any propositions or doctrines of a particular faith. That is not what we are called to follow and to be.

We are called to follow the Way of love and be the bearers of peace in the world and in our relationships. This I believe is what Jesus meant when he said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life." The Way of love. There's no other way to really live.

[Rick is an M.Div. graduate of the Pacific School of Religion and also received a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of California, Berkeley. He publishes, edits, and maintains several email groups and websites under the name www.PeacePolitical.com and welcomes comments and discussion of this and other articles at the Googlegroup